PFMS Help & Support   |   News & Events   |   Healthcare Resources & Support Topics   |   CollaborateMD   |   FilesAnywhere   |   User Login

 
 

 

Beware of the Long Reach of the Prosecutor

November 10, 2009 | HBMA Journal


Risks & Costs you Cant Afford to Ignore

November 10, 2009 | HBMA Journal


Beware of the Long Reach of the Prosecutor

November 10, 2009 | HBMA Journal


Beware of the Long Reach of the Prosecutor

November 10, 2009 | HBMA Journal


 

 

 

 

 

 

Print Page     Send to Friend

Beware of the Long Reach of the Prosecutor

REIMBURSEMENT DEPENDS UPON THE CORRECT PLACE-OF-SERVICE CODES


The importance of correct place-of-service codes on a claim form is an often overlooked part of many billing and compliance programs. Place-of-service (POS) coding errors are significant enough to have been identified by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) in several of its reports. In January 2005, an audit by the OIG determined that some medical practices were reporting claims with an incorrect POS. The audit revealed that services were being reported with a POS of “office,” when in fact, the services were actually rendered in an outpatient department or ambulatory facility. This resulted in claims being overpaid. Specifically, 88 of the 100 claims that were sampled showed that while the services were performed in a facility setting, the services were billed incorrectly with the place of service as “office.”

The correct place-of-service code is important because it ensures that Medicare is not duplicating payment to the physician (Part B) and the facility (Part A) for any portion of the
practice or overhead expense incurred to perform the service. The audit results were concerning enough that in 2008 the OIG added place-of-service errors on claims submitted by physicians
as a specific item on their annual work plan.

According to the work plan, “We will review physician coding of place of service on claims for services performed in ambulatory surgical centers (ASC) and hospital outpatient departments. Federal regulations at 42 CFR § 414.22(b)(5)(i)(B) provide for different levels of payments to physicians depending on where the services are performed. Medicare pays a physician a higher
amount when a service is performed in a non-facility setting, such as a physician’s office, than it does when the service is performed in a hospital outpatient department or, with certain exceptions,
in an ASC. We will determine whether physicians properly coded the places of service on claims for services provided in ASCs and hospital outpatient departments.”

Often, a claim denial is the first clue that an incorrect placeof-service code has been billed. A common error can be found when an emergency room visit is billed as an inpatient hospital place of service. While the patient may have been admitted as a result of the services received in the emergency department, services that were performed in the emergency department by Part B providers must be billed with place-of-service code 23, emergency room, hospital. While the facility services billed to Part A for that patient would be bundled into the inpatient payment, the Part B services are not. A complete listing of the various places of service codes can be found in the front of
most editions of the CPT-4 manual.

By Gretchen Segado, MS, PCS, CPC, CCP-P

Located in the HBMA Journal